South Outer

No

Absolutely not. This is nonsensical high rise development that destroys a wildly successful and imperative commercial center to surrounding communities and beyond. The idea that you would replace a significant revenue generating commercial area with a community center density intensive area to satisfy erroneous and unproven assumptions is unjustifiable.

This temperature range seems odd. Where is it 32 degrees in the summer?

Ardrey

There already is a significant variety of housing types in this area, with the exception of subsidized low-income housing. I can see a place for some where there is a lot of walkable destinations and employment.

This range of median incomes is so large it doesn't tell the reader very much.

Nowhere in this doc can I find any definition of "moderate density, mixed use" or "mixed density" or for that matter, any of the incredibly vague terminology used. As someone who lives off Blakeney Heath, there's no way on this planet that road can handle the inevitable traffic this silly(?) design will bring. Tell you what - happy to meet any of the planners(?) at 0800 and anytime from 1530-1700 hr at the intersection of Rea and Audrey Kell so they can witness what traffic is like NOW

Stop pushing leftist policies. We need parks and open space.

NO ROUNDABOUTS AT INTERSECTIONS OF AUDREY KELL AND REA RED, NO ROUNDABOUTS AT INTERSECTIONS OF REA RD AND TOM SHORT!!!!! DO NOT DISTROY OUR BEAUTIFUL SECTION OF CHARLOTTE!!!

5 story building what constitutes mixed use? commercial office ground, parking garages?

Your adding 4 story buildings bordering current residential area. We currently have pr0blems with trash, traffic along a scenic route along with the Omni school.

Instead of adding to all the congestion let’s improve the roads, sidewalks first.

Whoever drew this clearly has never been to Blakeney. Regency is not going to demolish all of the anchor retail of this shopping center (Target, Harris Teeter, etc) to build apartments and a park - that's the most valuable part of the shopping center for them... If this site is worthy of being upzoned to CAC (which is is), then the adjacent N1 parcels are all being severely underutilized as single family homes.
Rather than expecting the commercial owner to destroy their biggest value driver to make the site denser and more walkable, maybe look at the adjacent sites that are underutilized.

This is an incredibly congested intersection. More pedestrian improvements, while nice, would definitely slow down traffic - especially when 521 is expanded from 495 to SC border.

The number one priority in 10 out of the 15 neighborhoods is for housing availability? There is no shortage of housing or apartments we have vancancies because they overbuilt! So the only reasonable conclusion is that the study suggests our housing prices are too high? That's capitalism...you can't control the market prices or the macro-economic environment. Just because I want to live in quail hollow doesn't give me the right or mean they should build cheap duplexes so I can. This study focuses on a far-left socialist agenda rather than real ways to improve the city. Genuinely curious how many tax dollars were spent on this study to tell us we need more of this race here and that race there. Charlotte councilemen let me save you some of our money in the future build bike lanes and improve walkability.

We need street lighting down here in the Ballantyne Area. Parts of Rea Rd. Are dark and Ardrey Kell is like a country road at night. It is dangerous.

Saving our tree canopy is a joke. They just took down 20 beautiful large cherry trees on Rea Road last week and they are taking down more on Rea Road near 485. I am totally disgusted with what I am seeing happening. You may say that you will replant some, but I won’t see them get large in my lifetime!!!