×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Northeast Inner

Scroll down to review this draft Community Area Plan, provide your comments, and see what others are saying. Click anywhere on the document to leave a comment and use the dropdown menu to jump to a specific chapter. Each Community Area Plan will also have a standard set of appendices, you can view them here, or by clicking the Appendices button at the top of the page. You can also view a summary of the content in the virtual open house at CAPOpenHouse.com.

These plans will be available for public comment until May 9, 2025.

Thanks for visiting!

Commenting here is public and similar to speaking at a public meeting, click here for details of our moderation practices and if you have questions please email moderator@migcom.com

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


Concern
Not quite sure where to put a transit-related concern, but turning left out when exiting the Eastway Regional Recreation Center is a genuine hazard, since Eastway Drive is also very busy around there. If someone wants to take a safer route back towards The Plaza by first turning right, then it will be a long time before they can actually properly turn around.
Suggestion
This should be reduced to NC
Suggestion
All of the areas in the Plaza Midwood business district should be reduced to NC. If one of the priority goals is to retain character and charm of the neighborhood, these designations need to align more closely to that goal. When you look at the recent developments in the area, the push back and conversations from the neighbors and business is related to the height of these buildings and what it does to the homes of residences, the lack of charm, quality of build etc. We would save ourselves A LOT of energy by align this more appropriately to what neighbors and residents actually want in these areas.
in reply to Phillip Gussman's comment
Concern
If I could put 100 thumbs up on this comment, I would. It is important to the neighborhood to retain the character of the small, historic businesses and buildings. It is very much part of what attracts residents to the area. In addition, larger newer building drive an increase in cost of commercial spaces further driving out local, small businesses. This takes away from the charm and character that is needs to be (and a priority goal) to preserve.
in reply to Louise Hindal Acer's comment
Concern
I agree with the comments above. If one of the priorities is to preserve the charm and character of the neighborhood, large tall buildings sitting directly next to a single family home in the historic district takes away from the charm and character.
in reply to Louise Hindal Acer's comment
Also, at least part of each of these blocks abuts the Plaza Midwood Historic District. It seems incongruous to suggest that 5-7 story buildings should be directly next to the historic district, much of which is one story bungalows. Goal #9 of the Comprehensive Plan is to “Retain our Identity and Charm”. Let’s give these blocks of the historic district the best chance possible of retaining their charm by not allowing buildings that are 3+ times their height to be built on their block or across the street. Neighborhood Center would be a better transition.
in reply to Louise Hindal Acer's comment
Suggestion
Additionally, the Policy Map Manual suggests that zoning transitions are needed when adjacencies exist between CAC place types and N1 place types (pg. 8). These are short blocks. There is little room for zoning transition within the block. Neighborhood Center does not have the same requirement when adjacent to N1, and so if these blocks were switched to Neighborhood Center, they could act as the transition.
Suggestion
I think that the four blocks north of Central Ave, south of Hamorton, and between Clement and Nandina that currently have the place type Community Activity Center should be re-typed to Neighborhood Center. Neighborhood Center would still allow for increased density and mixed use while providing a guaranteed transition and more limited building height directly next to Neighborhood 1/single family homes.
Question
This is VERY important right here next to the historic district. Wouldn't one way to do that easily be to change the place type of the block north of Central to the place type of Neighborhood Center rather than Community Activity Center anywhere it touches Neighborhood 1 or the historic district?
Concern
The building heights in the business district and next to homes should be significantly reduced. It does not align the with keeping the character and charm of the neighborhood. It also reduces the attraction and value of the individual family homes in the Commonwealth Morningside neighborhood.
Suggestion
There are 2 intersections into the property at the Food Lion parking lot. The first entrance after crossing The Plaza should be closed. It creates a real safety issues with cars trying to go into the parking lot.
Support
We need to keep the Rail Trail whether we get the Silver Line or not. Please work to make that a reality!
Concern
Great example of why a street car in the lane of car travel doesn't work! Let's stop this bad idea and focus on improved bus infrastructure that can work withOUT destroying our local businesses in the process. Stop the Gold Line give us transit that works.
Support
This is essential, it's the oldest cliche in Charlotte that we tear down anything old, we have some old business districts that are struggling to maintain their uniqueness and character. We have organizations on the ground here on the inner east and northeast inner that are ready to help do this. They need more support with place making and organizing. We can save character while evolving, but that has to be led by the people in the communities!
Concern
Love the neighborhood center on Parkwood/The Plaza, not happy about it somehow allowing Auto Centric uses, Like the Valvoline at the corner of The Plaza and Matheson. If we are to rebuild this part of town to be walk, bike and transit friendly we can't have this new movement in the direction exactly opposite it.
in reply to Louise Hindal Acer's comment
Concern
I would suggest that we limit the CAC to CAC 1 only except where surrounded by further development. (CAC or TOD or the Highway) But certainly when on the edge of the Neighborhood 1 or Center.
Suggestion
perspective is moved down a bit - direction is okay.
Concern
I live near this intersection and love this. It's great! However, the proposed new oil change business on The Plaza and Matheson is in direct conflict with this. How can that be stopped?
Concern
Please prioritize Commercial-to-Neighborhood Center UDO Alignment Rezoning in the small business district area along Central Avenue bisected by the in-design Briar Creek Greenway (Central @ Arnold Drive vicinity) .
The current General Commercial UDO designation of this area has already brought a change of use that would not be allowed under Neighborhood Center nor would it have been allowed under the legacy B1/B2 zoning prior to UDO.
This use, the result of a real estate transaction, runs counter to neighbors’ ped/bike, local neighborhood feel and floodplain preservation vision for the area which we expressed in 2040 Map meetings.
Concern
Putting Community Activity Center directly next to Neighborhood 1 here will likely lead to frustration. Why not designate this side of Central as Neighborhood Center anywhere it touches Neighborhood 1?
Suggestion
C8 and C9, regarding Public Plazas & Courtyards not being aligned with City aspirations - yeah those areas seem very "empty"; the shopping district with the Rose's by C9 is dismal and badly in need of renovation, and the C8 area I think only really has a card games shop, but C8 also needs help in general since that neighborhood has been dealing with suspicious activities and quality of life issues for years.
Concern
I think having a traffic signal at the Eastway/Citiside intersection is a good idea in theory, especially since anyone wanting to drive immediately across from Citiside over to Weldon and vice versa has to take a gamble with everyone's lives. I'm concerned with how that might interrupt the flow of traffic through Eastway, and additionally with traffic flow through Weldon, since the surrounding neighborhood is constantly clogged with suspicious vehicles, and that makes it difficult to navigate through there.
Suggestion
I'd recommend considering increasing the place type density along Parkwood Ave and Matheson Ave. Matheson Ave has direct access to the XCLT Trail and also has a City funded cycle track project to connect to the XCLT Trail. In my opinion, it makes more sense to increase density so more citizens will be inclined to walk/bike/etc. to City funded infrastructure, also considering both Parkwood and Matheson Ave are thoroughfare streets. I don't think the land values or context are appropriate to limit to single-family through quadruplex development.
Concern
Re: Central Avenue from St Julien to Wembley Drive. UDO Place Type says General Commercial, which is inappropriate, It should be Neighborhood Activity Center as in 2040 and the neighborhoods' expressed vision. Almos all legacy zoning was B-1, with small lots, limited parking and small shops. Residential Neighborhoods abut the backs of the businesses. Briar Creek Greenway (planned and in design phase) passes through it connecting across Independence Blvd to Monroe Road and beyond, calling for a ped/bike focus. We are afraid of development under General Comercial (already has occurred) that is inconsistent with neighbors' our vision, so we think the (corrective) change in Place Type is urgent.
Suggestion
Eastway Crossing and the Food Lion Shopping Center across Eastway are currently auto-centric and unsafe for pedestrian or bicycle entry. Encourage and assist the owners to make protected bike/ped pathways throughout to increase neighborhood activity.
Suggestion
Briar Creek Greenway, currently in construction and design connecting Central Avenue to Monroe Road, provides a great opportunity for the business district on the greenway at Central Avenue to brand itself as a ped/bike destination with restauraunts, coffee shops, and small businesses, many existing. Rebrand this area (with merchant input) and make infrastructure improvments to make it more attractive.
Question
This map appears to be for focus area #2 (Central + Plaza), rather than Focus area 1 (Plaza + Matheson)
Concern
The number one priority in 10 out of the 15 neighborhoods is for housing availability? There is no shortage of housing or apartments we have vancancies because they overbuilt! So the only reasonable conclusion is that the study suggests our housing prices are too high? That's capitalism...you can't control the market prices or the macro-economic environment. Just because I want to live in quail hollow doesn't give me the right or mean they should build cheap duplexes so I can. This study focuses on a far-left socialist agenda rather than real ways to improve the city. Genuinely curious how many tax dollars were spent on this study to tell us we need more of this race here and that race there. Charlotte councilemen let me save you some of our money in the future build bike lanes and improve walkability.
Concern
If we want to incentivize more housing and continue to add to the housing supply we have got to start transitioning "traditional" single family housing within the Neighborhood 1 place types that are next to community and neighborhood centers to Neighborhood 2 place types. There is no reason to enshrine low density in these areas as they are the key to expanding walkability and transit use. Keeping these place types as Neighborhood 1 will only keep housing prices high and depress future growth within existing walkable neighborhoods. The new map has essentially not changed anything.
Support
Yes, we’d love to see this area transition into a neighborhood center!! However, the proposal to allow a Valvoline station at the Plaza and Matheson betrays this vision and the local residents. How will we transition if the city council is willing to ignore strategic vision and pollute our neighborhood?
Question
These zoning maps for maps 15 and 16 are the same for both sites, was there supposed to be different ones shown?