×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

South Middle

Scroll down to review this draft Community Area Plan, provide your comments, and see what others are saying. Click anywhere on the document to leave a comment and use the dropdown menu to jump to a specific chapter. Each Community Area Plan will also have a standard set of appendices, you can view them here, or by clicking the Appendices button at the top of the page. You can also view a summary of the content in the virtual open house at CAPOpenHouse.com.

These plans will be available for public comment until May 9, 2025.

Thanks for visiting!

Commenting here is public and similar to speaking at a public meeting, click here for details of our moderation practices and if you have questions please email moderator@migcom.com

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


Suggestion
Does access include safety and comfort? This includes adequate lighting, sidewalks, crosswalks, shaded paths and more.
Question
Where are the areas with low access to housing opportunities?
Question
Community activity center is a very broad term, it would be nice to get a more descriptive definition. What exactly can we expect from a community activity center?
Question
Can you give more details? This is very broad I can't determine the areas identified.
Suggestion
CC-6 & CC-7 presents a real opportunity for both the City and County to lead by example—especially in the TNF service area, where they already own a significant number of parcels. After reviewing property records, I’ve identified multiple sites owned by Mecklenburg County, CPCC, and the City of Charlotte. Rather than waiting for private partnerships, they could start with their own land.

By activating these publicly owned lots with community gardens, parks, or pop-up events, local government can demonstrate a true investment in our neighborhoods and model what’s possible. This kind of leadership would show residents that equitable development isn’t just a vision—it’s already underway.

Support
This is a great idea—especially for the TNF service area, which is incredibly diverse racially, culturally, and generationally. It's critical that we take the time to celebrate and uplift the existing culture and history before the landscape shifts with the arrival of $400,000+ luxury townhomes.

This is an area long known for its naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH). As change approaches, we must ensure that the identity and voices of current residents remain front and center.
Concern
Once again, I want to emphasize that the TNF service area is fundamentally different from the rest of South Middle. Our proximity to I-77, industrial complexes, and multiple major interstates creates unique challenges that require tailored solutions—not a one-size-fits-all approach.

For more background on our priorities and the issues we’re tackling, I encourage you to visit our website: link.

We’re eager to work collaboratively, but it's essential that this area receives focused attention and a dedicated planning conversation.

Concern
This reinforces my earlier point: Nations Ford, Arrowood, and South Boulevard—the TNF service area—warrants a dedicated meeting. The challenges here are distinct from those in other parts of South Middle, particularly around displacement vulnerability and environmental justice.

When is the Planning Department available to host an in-person meeting in our community? It’s critical that residents have the opportunity to share their lived experiences and shape the future of their neighborhoods—especially in an area as impacted as this one.
Support
This reinforces my earlier point: Nations Ford, Arrowood, and South Boulevard—the TNF service area—warrants a dedicated meeting. The challenges here are distinct from those in other parts of South Middle, particularly around displacement vulnerability and environmental justice.

When is the Planning Department available to host an in-person meeting in our community? It’s critical that residents have the opportunity to share their lived experiences and shape the future of their neighborhoods—especially in an area as impacted as this one.
Question
Could you share more context on this proposal? It looks like a neighborhood center may be in the works—I’d love to learn more.

Also, please don’t forget about the city-owned property at England and Arrowood, which connects directly to the County’s Kings Branch Greenway. This is an ideal opportunity to discuss a potential easement and foster intergovernmental collaboration.

Imagine residents being able to walk to essential services—like the grocery store or pharmacy—through a safe, shaded greenway instead of along a busy road inhaling car emissions. Let’s prioritize infrastructure that promotes health, access, and quality of life.
Concern
A genuine commitment to Vision Zero must prioritize basic infrastructure—starting with functioning street lights. In just a small portion of the Nations Ford (TNF) service area, I’ve reported over 100 outages. To date, Duke Energy has not completed those repairs. Forest Point Boulevard is another example—only two lights are working along the entire corridor.

Before we expand further, we must take stock of our existing infrastructure. Safety and visibility are non-negotiable when it comes to improving residents’ quality of life. I’ve reached out to the Vision Zero office, but we need cross-agency coordination and urgency to address these fundamental needs.

Let’s not lose sight of the basics in pursuit of bold goals. Residents deserve to feel safe walking or driving in their neighborhoods—especially at night.
Concern
This map and service area is a prime example of why TNF exists to amplify residents' voices in Nations Ford/Arrowood/ and along South Boulevard, which has historically been underinvested and sees little to no support. Our area is on the border of affluent parts of town (the wedge). This map and distinction perpetuate our previous conversations. Our part of the map is extremely different than our Eastern neighborhoods and showcases all place types. Host a workshop in the area for residents of the area who have concerns and questions that are completely different than the rest of "South Middle." Our residents and place types are diverse
Concern
This is problematic as the state is planning on expanding 1-77 south from 6 lanes to 10 lanes; all tow lanes and redo all the bridges that cross 77. As a result, residents will be taking alternative roots likely through highways that will create environmental ramifications for communities along 1-77 many of which are underserved.
Suggestion
All bike lanes should be protected, especially in areas with higher speed limits. Even if its low cost barriers like planters seen in Plaza Midwood.
Question
Will goal 2 and 3 work together to achieve these goals? Since the transit corridors are probably referring to the South Blvd section of the blue line, is it safe to say that increased housing development will continue to occur near there and will affordable housing be requirements for new developments?
Suggestion
We very much need pedestrian crossing options along Johnston Road, as well as some form of protected sidewalk along Johnston from Torrington South to Ballantyne Commons. Almost every day, I see someone walking along the side of Johnston Road along that stretch because there are no sidewalks present. Additionally, the sidewalks along Johnston Road from Carmel into Ballantyne could use some form of barrier between the sidewalk and traffic to improve pedestrian safety. We've had a number of accidents that have resulted in cars crossing into the sidewalks, risking serious injury to pedestrians.
Concern
The number one priority in 10 out of the 15 neighborhoods is for housing availability? There is no shortage of housing or apartments we have vancancies because they overbuilt! So the only reasonable conclusion is that the study suggests our housing prices are too high? That's capitalism...you can't control the market prices or the macro-economic environment. Just because I want to live in quail hollow doesn't give me the right or mean they should build cheap duplexes so I can. This study focuses on a far-left socialist agenda rather than real ways to improve the city. Genuinely curious how many tax dollars were spent on this study to tell us we need more of this race here and that race there. Charlotte councilemen let me save you some of our money in the future build bike lanes and improve walkability.
Concern
This has to be incorrect. With 485 and other major roads cutting through our neighborhoods and community, environment must remain intact. I would classify this as a high priority.
Suggestion
The city needs to leverage the area around Arrowood station a lot better in terms of supporting pedestrian access to the station. There needs to be more housing/job opportunities around the station to get more people to use it. Right now, there's a park and ride and a grocery store around the station. It makes sense why the station isn't popular. There's vacant land next to the USCIS Application Support Center that could be used to fill these needs. We could even take money from the Housing Trust Fund to build affordable housing on the land
Suggestion
Pineville-Matthews Rd & Providence Rd Intersection improvements are very much needed. There is so much traffic from people commuting from Uptown or traveling East/West on Pineville-Matthews Rd to the activity nodes on the road.
Improvements to the transportation network around the Arboretum should definitely be a top priority as it is a central node that the more southern portion of "South Middle" congregates around. Waverly is too far south and gets most of the Ballantyne traffic while SouthPark gets the traffic in the more northern portion of "South Middle" Charlotte. There should be plans to make the area more friendly to all transportation uses (sidewalks, bike lanes, e.t.c.) and make the area more equitable for all people/transit uses
Suggestion
There should be bike lanes or multi-use trail lane along Woodlark.
Suggestion
Rutledge Road is a cut-through between Randolph and Providence. I requested bike lanes years ago but it is about 2 feet too narrow. Something should still be done such as a multi-use path along one side only. There are many walkers/runners in the area.
in reply to Eric Banks's comment
Concern
There is also no bike parking at Cotswold Village Center.
Support
The S.A. crossing at Robin Road has improved the safety and inspired more neighborhood walkers.
Concern
No striped bike lanes or sharrows in the area. There is a bike signal trigger at McAlway and Randolph.
Concern
Existing sidewalk along Sharon Amity has no planting strip. Concrete blocks have been raised up by tree routes. Cars routinely go 45mph + along S.A. road making even a walk on the sidewalk dangerous.
Suggestion
There is a "bike route" along Ferncliff Road. It would be nice to see a kind of "greenway" like the County established along Jameston Road between Freedom Park and Westfield. Sharrows along Woodlark, Ferncliff, Greenwich, and Rutledge Roads would help.
Support
We need a group like the Southpark neighbors and MoRa group to rebrand Cotswold. It's currently "just a shopping center." It would be nice to establish Cotswold as a true "neighborhood."
Suggestion
Woodlark Road between Randolph and Sharon Amity is used by many runners, F3 groups, cyclists, and walkers but does not have any dedicated or striped lanes. It should have at least a multi-use trail along one side.
Suggestion
Woodlark is a very wide road and should have striped bike lanes.
Question
What is the Cotswold Mobility Hub?
Suggestion
A signal at S.A. road and Cotswold Village would be ideal.
Suggestion
Very auto-oriented center right now. There are zero bike racks or parking spaces. The owners recently converted the fire lane to cram in more automobile parking spaces. The existing spaces are striped to a ridiculously narrow width. There are 3 fitness type places here which, ironically, require most of the parking spots during class hours which has to impact the other stores negatively. It would be nice to see parking for bikes however the roads feeding the shopping center have to bike lanes so it is a treacherous trip, even for a short distance.
Suggestion
This is a high-crash stretch of road due to westbound left turns into the Horizon eye care and eastbound left turns out of the CV shopping center. A traffic light here may correlate traffic better and