×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Downtown Waterfront Improvement Plan

Share your thoughts on the four big moves!
  1. The Downtown Waterfront Improvements Plan aims to better connect residents, Downtown workers and visitors to the Downtown waterfront area through accessibility and placemaking enhancements, including improving roadways, trails, parks, signage, lighting, and more.

The following information was presented at a public meeting in August and you have one more chance to provide your comments on four big moves for Buffalo's Downtown Waterfront Area. COMMENTING CLOSED 11/10/2023, this site is provided only for reference.

  • Do we have the right projects?
  • What are your priorities?
  • Any other comments?

We will be collecting the community's comments through September 30th. Please share this link with your networks: https://openhouse.konveio.com/DWIP

 

Click here to see the progress on Buffalo’s Smart Streets Design Plan (SSDP) and provide comments on the draft recommendations.

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Commenting is closed for this document.


Suggestion
These are great plans. I’d like to advocate for additional warming centers or outdoor warming stations.
0 replies
Suggestion
Mixed-use infill development, potentially including some structured parking, should absolutely be incetivized and built on the existing surface lots in this area, which are an unproductive, anti-urban, eyesore.
0 replies
Concern
Likely outside the scope of this plan, but it is a serious misuse of public funds and resources to demolish these buildings rather than using historic tax credits to rehabilitate the existing structures, like the NYCHA is doing throughout New York City
0 replies
Suggestion
Erie Street Redesign with separated bike lane looks great and should be prioritized from a cost/benefit perspective.
0 replies
Concern
I would advocate for srtistic installations, or even statues of notable historic Buffalo figures over religious symbols, which might seem divisive or a target for vandalism.
0 replies
Suggestion
Underpass looks great. I especially like the artistic crosswalk design.
0 replies
Suggestion
The multi-modal road diet for Porter looks great. But wasn't the Porter Circle recently redesigned/rebuilt/invested in? It seems like the funds for that could be reallocated to other priority items.
0 replies
Suggestion
The new pedestrian bridge over the 190 should be expanded, if possible, to include a green space/small hill/cap for recreation with both city and water views.
0 replies
Suggestion
Like to see more things for Riverside park.
0 replies
Suggestion
Would be nice if the train went along this portion of downtown and north towards AKG and further. Provide better connectivity without needing a car.
0 replies
Suggestion
Whatever it is that you design, just please bring density to the downtown area. We NEED more dense, walkable neighborhoods so that downtown isn't a deadspot, especially post-COVID.
0 replies
in reply to Brendan's comment
Suggestion
Agree; there's short, mid and long term recommendations for treatments endorsed by the Bike-Ped Advisory Board that can be pursued, including an option for the cycle track with the stairwell.
0 replies
Suggestion
Project is named "Bridge View Plaza" in the NFTA study, might be worth aligning here.
0 replies
Suggestion
See suggested naming changes on the map legend at the top.
0 replies
Suggestion
South Park Multi-modal Access Improvements would seem to fit more closely with the description here, while the DL&W Station & Shoreline Trail improvements make sense in the #4 Regional category.
0 replies
Suggestion
If possible, #12 could be split into two as DL&W Shoreline Trail & Bridge View Plaza Improvements and South Park Avenue Multi-modal Access Improvements. The two together can be a little confusing since they represent different access projects.
0 replies
Suggestion
Project #13: Could this be renamed to DL&W Station instead of DL&W - Proposed?
0 replies
Question
I don't understand the Marine raised intersection. Is this your way of saying this a first step to get rid of the Skyway?
0 replies
Suggestion
6 - 12 pickleball courts with fixed lines, nets, and lights in Ralph Wilson Park would be incredible. It is the fastest growing sport in the country and we unfortunately do not have much access to the sport in Buffalo with people having to travel out into the suburbs to play. Compared to tennis courts, they are used a lot more and allow for many more people to use it for their smaller size. 12 people can play on 3 pickleball courts in about the size of one tennis court. It would be great for people of all ages!
0 replies
5
0 replies
4
0 replies
3
0 replies
2
0 replies
1
0 replies
Concern
Neighborhood parking benefit districts for lower west side would help with existing residents need for parking and go a long way to support neighborhood investments to improve quality of life for the current negative impacts free parking creates for residents.
0 replies
Suggestion
There are very few access point to the waterfront. More East/West connections to the existing neighborhoods.
0 replies
Concern
If the goal is to strengthen connections to neighborhoods, there needs to be East/West bike/ped onnections, not just North/ South. Streets such as Virginia, Carolina, W.Huron are all very wide one-way streets that currently only accommodate vehicles.
0 replies
Suggestion
Turn the 190 to a high volume boulevard. These have been in use in other cities and were developed by Olmsted in NYC such as Ocean Parkway.
0 replies
Concern
There have been plans since the early 2000's to rethink the impact of the 190 dividing the city and its residents to the waterfront. The green code even has a transect for a high volume boulevard which cold still maintain existing vehicle traffic while providing equitable access to west side residents to the waterfront. Pedestrian bridges are not the solution.
0 replies
Question
Why does the plan exclude a significant swath of the lower west side neighborhood sandwiched in between the central business district and the waterfront? This plan should support existing residents.
0 replies
Suggestion
These ramps are far too big. They could be significanlty reduced with the land returned to productive urban use.
0 replies
Suggestion
Feeder ramps are too long and take up far far far more space than can be justified. These ramps should be shortened to segements parallel to the highway with 90 degree turns to the east west direction, The city stree grid should be restored and a significant parkway should be inserted to create a direct connection from Niagara Street to the new Ralph Wilson Park.
0 replies
Suggestion
Thruway needs to be buried or eliminated in the downtown area. Highways do not need to pass through downtown. They just need to feed downtown. This is a major barrior that needs to be eliminated.
0 replies
Concern
These blocks are much to big. Giant deve;opment blocks will never yield quality walkable urban space
0 replies
Cool
0 replies
Suggestion
love the buffered bike paths! More of these on all streets.
0 replies
Concern
way too many parking garages. Use this space for more housing and consider improving public transit access
0 replies
Concern
this is just lipstick on a pig. Don't try to make a highway overpass more friendly...it needs to be removed altogether
0 replies
Suggestion
I like the proposed separated, buffered bike lane shown here over painted lanes or sharrows. However, I was under the impression that the NFTA's stairwell/bridge project at DL&W terminal would reduce the street width at one point between DL&W and the arena enough that a buffered bike lane would not fit. It's worth coordinating with NFTA to find a creative solution that allows the existence of a continuous buffered bike lane along South Park even with the stairwell project (maybe a brief sidepath instead of sidewalk in that small section of street).
1 reply